Directional Theory: Toward, Against, Away

February 8th, 2008 · 2 Comments

karen_horney_1938.jpg

Every day we are faced with countless judgment calls about life’s events: Is this project going well or poorly? Is it better to push or withdraw regarding a conflict with a colleague? Right now, does my child need my loving presence or a stern reminder?

These are very nuanced questions. What is the best way to answer them?

Karen Horney’s directional theory is very useful in this regard. In 1945, this German Freudian psychoanalyst proposed three ways people defend themselves psychically: they either move toward danger to pacify it, against danger to combat it, or away from it to avoid it. Although we employ all three, one of these is usually our default response to what frightens us. (Another is secondary and the third is often our blind spot.)

The twitter board (which I love) is a great place to observe this. Even with all the little cues we use to convey intention (emoticons, asterisks, exclamation points) we still don’t always know what someone means and so react to what we imagine is meant. Some tweets seem designed to combat, some to create closeness, others to deflect.

As mentioned, we each have our preferred style. For example, my style is to move away from people and things I don’t like. I’m a fabulous disappear-er-er. I’d much rather move on than engage or pacify conflict. This is what makes me feel safe. (Remember, we move in the direction we think will bring safety.) On the other hand, my husband finds security in moving against. When we have a terrifying scream-fest (or what he calls a “robust conversation”), he feels that we’re really getting to the heart of the matter, really solving our problems once and for all. I suddenly really, really need to wash my hair. I’ll do anything to get away him. What to do? When I feel his energy moving against me, if I can drop my style and move toward him, I can often provide the sense of connection he’s looking for from a fight, but without the fight. Then we can actually talk about whatever is bothering us.

In addition, beyond personalities, situations seem to move toward, against, or away from us. It can be very helpful to determine the direction of a particular endeavor at any point in time. Negotiations are great for these types of determinations: when trying to push your agenda forward, is it time to fight, befriend, or say nothing?

It can be said that toward, against, and away are the three ways energy itself moves. There is nothing mysterious about this; a proper read of the energy leads to much more effective action. It’s very practical.

So when you have to face a situation or a person, it can be tremendously helpful to ask these three questions:

What direction am I moving in regarding this situation or person?
What direction is it moving in?
In determining my actions (or non-actions), is my decision based solely on my particular style or is it a skillful assessment of the circumstance itself?

Karen Horney. You go girl.

 

PS The enneagram, of course, utilizes the directional theory

Tags: enneagram

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Cathy // Feb 8, 2008 at 9:16 pm

    So interesting, Susan. Thanks! I think I tend to go towards danger then sometimes I wonder why!! I wonder if we ought to try out different approaches so we get the wisdom to know which is best under which circumstances. or maybe they’re all fine, just a different experience. Hmmmm.

  • 2 Idara // Feb 11, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    This is great stuff! Yes, indeed Ms. Horney was on to something here…I ran across a quote a while back by Pina Ferlisi
    (Senior Vice President at the Gap of all things) who said, ” I’m not a fighter. I let people know where I stand and either it works out or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, I block that person out. Life is too short to waste energy on people who don’t get you.”

    When I ran across this quote initially it seemed a bit cold, but I have come to realize it really speaks to the way I roll in this life. However, I would “warm” this thinking a bit by stressing that it all may come down to how one wishes to expend their energy. I have never thought fighting was the best use of my energy. As a first generation American of African descent, many of the women I witnessed growing up wound up specializing in “fighting” as their way to confront the limitations that the patriarchal culture impinged on their relationships with men. Watching this I could not figure out why they could not just date (or marry) a guy that shared the egalitarian values they desired, instead of being in perpetual struggle in the patriarchal mindset. It just seemed like an incredible waste of energy to me- “like going to the hardware store for milk.” This was further confirmed when I would approach relationships later on with “my dukes up” only to be met with amusement along the lines of “relax babe, it is SO not that serious”- LOL.
    Some people need “the fight” or drama to feel fully alive. I am definitely not in this category- I would tend to constrict, withdraw or reach for the carbs- or a combination of all three :) I think neither directionality in Horney’s thesis is either “good” or “bad.” My one concern is that the disappearing act I have effectuated from time to time may really deprive me in the end of learning how to articulate my needs more clearly, but at least I have the energy to give things another shot down the line :)

Leave a Comment