<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Byron Katie on Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/byron-katie-on-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/byron-katie-on-love/</link>
	<description>Susan Piver - Meditation, Relationships, Creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:23:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Davee</title>
		<link>http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/byron-katie-on-love/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Davee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/?p=524#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>hi susan, i see the point made about projection, and at the same time there is relative truth yes? by that i mean that though ultimately we are seeing projection, it&#039;s based on some relative interactions that are relatively true or potentially accurate. if i&#039;m bothered by a lack of shared responsibility with housework, that&#039;s not all projection. :)

that said, we do often blame our emotions on the &quot;other&quot;. so then how to discuss that without sounding nihilistic, sound like it&#039;s all projection. that&#039;s what i hear in her tone, that i can completely ignore you if you complain about my not walking the dog. maybe she isn&#039;t saying that really, but it just seems like there could be a way of expressing both the quality of story/projection/etc. - the quality of self projection into the environment - and at the same time acknowledge the relative interplay and interdependence of the situation and one&#039;s emotional state. we start where we are. our klesha arises from our karma. just ignoring that as project seems too heaven and not enough earth: too much like pushing away the reality of our experience in the name of some ultimate. maybe it&#039;s just presenting view and not path, and later she talks about path?

best,
davee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi susan, i see the point made about projection, and at the same time there is relative truth yes? by that i mean that though ultimately we are seeing projection, it&#8217;s based on some relative interactions that are relatively true or potentially accurate. if i&#8217;m bothered by a lack of shared responsibility with housework, that&#8217;s not all projection. <img src='http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>that said, we do often blame our emotions on the &#8220;other&#8221;. so then how to discuss that without sounding nihilistic, sound like it&#8217;s all projection. that&#8217;s what i hear in her tone, that i can completely ignore you if you complain about my not walking the dog. maybe she isn&#8217;t saying that really, but it just seems like there could be a way of expressing both the quality of story/projection/etc. &#8211; the quality of self projection into the environment &#8211; and at the same time acknowledge the relative interplay and interdependence of the situation and one&#8217;s emotional state. we start where we are. our klesha arises from our karma. just ignoring that as project seems too heaven and not enough earth: too much like pushing away the reality of our experience in the name of some ultimate. maybe it&#8217;s just presenting view and not path, and later she talks about path?</p>
<p>best,<br />
davee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCStaples</title>
		<link>http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/byron-katie-on-love/#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>TCStaples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/?p=524#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @spiver: New blog post: Byron Katie on Love. Her POV is extraordinarily helpful, deep, true,...  http://snurl.com/bvg6k&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @spiver: New blog post: Byron Katie on Love. Her POV is extraordinarily helpful, deep, true,&#8230;  <a href="http://snurl.com/bvg6k" rel="nofollow">http://snurl.com/bvg6k</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Piver</title>
		<link>http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/byron-katie-on-love/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Piver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susanpiver.com/wordpress/?p=524#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New blog post: Byron Katie on Love. Her POV is extraordinarily helpful, deep, true, &amp; easy to become confused about. http://snurl.com/bvg6k&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New blog post: Byron Katie on Love. Her POV is extraordinarily helpful, deep, true, &#038; easy to become confused about. <a href="http://snurl.com/bvg6k" rel="nofollow">http://snurl.com/bvg6k</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

